Rating The IPO Note: "Before IPO" and "After IPO" measure the use of the proceedings to enhance revenue growth. A small difference between the two Xs means funds from the proceedings probably will have little effect on the index. Rating Scale
|
| Material
On This Page Taken From Prospectus "The Company is the leading value brand and the third largest domestic manufacturer of general batteries (including alkaline, heavy duty and rechargeable alkaline), and is the leading worldwide manufacturer of hearing aid batteries. The Company is also the leading domestic manufacturer of rechargeable household batteries, heavy duty batteries and certain other specialty batteries, including lantern batteries and lithium batteries for personal computer clocks and memory backup. In addition, the Company is a leading marketer of battery-powered lighting products. Originally introduced in 1921, the Rayovac brand is a well recognized name in the battery industry. The Company attributes the longevity and strength of its brand name to its high-quality products and to the success of its marketing and merchandising initiatives. "The Company sells and distributes its products in several channels including mass merchandisers, food and convenience stores, drug and specialty retailers, hardware/home centers, department stores, hearing aid professionals, industrial and government/OEM. The Company markets all of its branded products under the Rayovac[RegTM] name and selected products under sub-brand names such as MAXIMUM[TM], Renewal[RegTM], Loud'n Clear[RegTM], ProLine[RegTM], Lifex[TM], Power Station[RegTM], Workhorse[RegTM], and Roughneck[RegTM]." Summary Of
Financial Data
Balance Sheet Data As of June 29, 1997
Use
Of Proceeds
|
| Comments Rayovac will enter the NYSE as the third largest supplier of batteries in the U.S. The Company boasts a 10% share in the U.S. alkaline battery market, a 38% share in heavy duty batteries, a 58% share in rechargeables, and a 50% share of the worldwide market in hearing aid batteries. This sturdy position in 96 returned $42.2 million in EBITDA on $423.4 million in revenue. Unfortunately, Rayovac is a distant third to two formidable competitors, Duracell International and Energizer. Duracell did $2.3 billion in 96 and claims a 50% share of the domestic market in alkaline batteries, by far the largest segment. In 95 it merged with The Gillette Company on a stock swap valued at $7 billion. Gillette itself will do about $9 billion in 97 sales and is ranked tenth among the Fortune 500 in total return to investors over the past decade. Warren Buffetts company, Berkshire Hathaway, owns 10.8% of the Gillette stock. The Energizer, its other competitor, which includes the Eveready brand, is owned by Ralston Purina Company. Ralston Purina "is the world's largest producer of dry dog food, dry and soft-moist cat food, and dry-cell battery products." This absurd combination of dog food and batteries makes for sizable earnings. In 96 they exceeded $6.1 billion in sales. As of 9/19/97 their stock was trading around $92, near its 52-week high. The company can show $3.68 in earnings per share and sports a PE ratio of 24. Old,
Dull & Strong Product is not the problem with this company, nor is manufacturing, nor distribution. Those three vast areashaving a product, knowing how to make it, and getting it into the consumer channelsare three-quarters of the battle, which theyve achieved. Thats why theyre ending up on the NYSE instead of the NASDAQ. Where theyve languished is in their marketing and sales strategies. Fundamental mistakes have been made, the end result being that theyve spent years getting pummeled by the competition. Duracell and Energizer have so far won the battle in establishing themselves in the mind of the consumer, and Rayovac has been squeezed out, a diminished brand name. Sometimes the Company created its own problems, for example, by applying too many resources and too much effort to small segments of the market, which cannot make a corresponding contribution to revenues. The alkaline battery market is perhaps the central market of the entire industry. To show significant growth in future years theyll have to make a bigger dent in it than the 10% they currently have. It means taking share aware from two companies that can eat them alive financially. This will be the ultimate tricksticking it to the competition without riling them up. Recapitalization
& Reinvigoration The new owners have taken two important actions, which may yet infuse life into this lackluster company. First, theyve swept away old management at the highest reaches and have brought in a team with a demonstrated track record in the consumer products industry. The team consists of a CEO (David A. Jones), a CFO, a Senior VP of Sales, and a Senior VP of Marketing. They claim "70 years of collective experience in the consumer products industry." And second, theyve begun the process of accumulating the heaps of money needed to capture more share of an extremely matured market. Aside from the IPO enriching the beneficial stockholders by countless millions of dollars, it will place the Company near the sources of capital needed for accelerated growth. The IPO will seek to put $92 million into the Companys pocket. An identical offering, called the International Offering, will take place concurrently outside the U.S. and Canada. The preliminary version of the prospectus doesnt state the number of shares available to the public or its opening price, but it likely will be in the neighborhood of 6 to 7 million shares opening between 16 and $18. With 20.5 million shares outstanding among beneficial stockholders, and options for another 4.3 million shares, there could be as many as 30 million shares in play by the end of its first year. Recapitalization has burdened the Company with $207 million in debt and an interest expense over the first 9 months of $19 million. Virtually all the proceedings will be used to pay down the debt. However, it would be hard to argue with either the recapitalization or the use of the proceedings. They both appear to be good moves. In the world of marketing, where this game will be won or lost, it cannot go mano a mano against multibillion dollar companies without a strong measure of financial wherewithal. Strategies
For Growth The problem is not product. Rayovac has plenty of variety in its product line of comparable quality to the competition. For each of the different categories of battery, the Company has a viable alternative to any of the products on the market. And those categories are manyfrom the general consumer sizes, C, D, AA, AAA, and 9-volt, which are bought in supermarkets or mass merchandising stores, to those for hearing aids, watches, cameras, and computers and still others in lighting products and industrial lanterns. The Company keeps a constant flow of new products entering the market. It does so on an 18-month cycle, and the cycle time is coming down. Plenty
Of Product, Weak Image What then can they do? Management will initiate an aggressive advertising campaign using higher levels of TV and print media. They will attempt to leverage their position in the market as the "value brand," that is, as the least expensive among the three. At the same time they will reorganize their approach toward distribution. Some channels are highly penetrated but small, and others are little penetrated but large. Apparently theyve re-evaluated which markets produce the biggest return for the amount of resources applied, and theyve restructured accordingly. Its a promising sign. They will play to their advantages by increasing their dominance in the worldwide market for hearing aid batteries. The U.S. market is not large, only $205 million, with a worldwide total of only $530 million. However, the money from this market is highly significant revenue to the Company, and it is an important vehicle for extending the brand name throughout all parts of its product line; hearing impaired people buy other kinds of batteries, as well. To this end they will elaborate on their product line and make it more enriched for the consumer. They will continue to use the much-admired golfer Arnold Palmer in their print media. And they will intensify their advertising. They will reposition some of their products, in particular their rechargeable alkaline battery. In this segment of the market they hold a 58% share. Theyve lowered the price by as much as 50% to stimulate consumer interest. Rechargeables have the potential for significant additional growth, which may be realized as the Company strengthens the Rayovac brand name overall. They will attempt to penetrate niche markets with new products. Some of these niches are substantial, such as batteries for computer memory backup. Others are underserved. Opportunities will be exploited especially with lighting products, which is a particularly dynamic area. And the Company will make strategic acquisitions for all the usual reasonsto extend its reach into new geographical areas or to get key technology or to add to its product line. Changes
Within The Company Second, theyve brought in a new advertising agency and have put together a national advertising campaign. To address the important alkaline battery market theyve come out with a new and improved product line and have given it fancy packaging that makes a stronger statement about the Company. Because of its size this market is critical to any hopes they have about accelerating their growth. Michael Jordan previously had been used to represent some of the Rayovac products. His contract has been extended now to cover all the products. Third, the Company has outsourced a number of functions that are more efficiently handled by othersthe mainframe computer operations, graphic design, packaging design, and payroll processing. This too is a good move. It reduces staff and complexity and at the same time increases the focus on exactly what the Company should be doing best, which is the manufacture and marketing of batteries. Fourth, theyve tightened their entire manufacturing operation by shutting down some facilities and transferring production to other plants, which themselves will gain greater efficiencies with the extra work. Given that the Company has 2,200 employees and an aggregate manufacturing capacity of 580,000 square feet its no small matter to reduce operational overhead by a few percentage points. And fifth, theyve brought in Electronic Data Systems to implement an integrated information system for the upgrade and modernization of its business operations. It should give them greater visibility and control especially over the manufacturing process where its expected to reduce the cycle time of getting new products to market. If all these changes work, they will have turned an old manufacturer lumbering along into a clever, aggressive, and responsive company. But
Will It Work? For 1998 a 3% increase in share among the General category of batteries translates into an additional $81 million in revenues. That in turn delivers another $5.8 million to the bottom line assuming 7.2% in net income. Likewise, a 5% increase in the worldwide hearing aid market for 98 would add another $29 million in revenue and $2 million in net income. The capture of that much market share is probably too much to ask of a company so soon. But all told, it would not be unreasonable to expect a lift in growth for 98 to 15%, which would be a ten point increase over the 5.1% annual average since 92. Ten points means their products, programs, and change in tactics should result in a $44.5 million improvement. A result of this size for the coming year would validate their approach. Goodbye
Income, Hello Debt Net tangible book value by the end of June 97 showed a deficit of $84 million caused by a $128 million cost in treasury stock. Treasury stock is the Companys stock repurchased by the Company itself. In June 96 there were 49.5 million shares outstanding. Going into the IPO this figure is down to 20.5 million. The difference of 29 million shares is the amount of treasury stock pulled back into the Company. To have fewer shares in play clearly is important. The
Curious Matter Of Treasury Stock The
Stocks Comfort Level In contrast, The Gillette Company will do about $9 billion in sales for 97. As of 9/12/97 its share price was $80.69 and had a market cap of $45.2 billion or 5 times expected 1997 revenues. Ralston Purina did $6.1 billion in sales for 96. As of 9/19/97 its share price was $92.19 with 106 million shares outstanding. This amounts to a market cap of $9.8 billion or 1.6 times revenues. It would appear the Company can support at least a $2530 stock price on 30 million shares outstanding if they can demonstrate an increased EBITDA percentage, which is attributable to growth in market share. |
| Copyright � 1997 Market Analytics | Reproduction of articles or reports is strictly prohibited without written permission from Market Analytics. Opinions expressed in the material are provided as information only. They do not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any security. |